User profile image

Delegating < 0.0001 ARB to:

starit.eth

User profile image
Starit

Delegating < 0.0001 ARB to:

starit.eth

blockchain developer since 2015. btc holder since 2013.

0x47F7...bA42

Arbitrum Delegation Statement

Name (organization or individual) Starit

Wallet Address or ENS starit.eth

Tally Profile URL Tally | Starit

What area are you most interested in contributing to? choose up to two tags:

  • DeFi development on Arbitrum
  • Tooling, Improving protocol decentralization

Please share your stance on overall goals for the DAO:
The final goal of DAO is to build a mechanism to unite the community and give back some of the rights of the protocol to the community members.

The decentralization progress of a protocol/project can be gradual. So the decentralized and full responsibilities of a DAO can also be gradual.

Please share your stance on issues that were raised previously, in other communities, as described below:

Fei Rari Merge Issue:
Issue Overview

Prompts to Answer:

  1. How would you vote?
    Against

I actually posted my opinion on this issue before the merge finished:
My Response to Fei Rari Merge Proposal

I am against the merge proposal and I listed specific reasons. Basically, I think the risk between DAOs should be separated in case of a hack. Unfortunately, what I am worried about becomes reality in a few months later.

  1. What amendments would you make to the proposal if any?

Only partnership, no merge of DAO.

  1. How would you approach the tradeoff between centralization of authority and the ability to get things done?

Decentralization is the final goal, before that, we can do it in a centralized way to implement some of the tools first.

Sample Voting Issue 2:
Issue Overview:
Overview Link 1
Overview Link 2

FEI RARI Hack Reimbursement: In April 2022 Rari was hacked for 80M, a vote was passed to reimburse those affected. Then in May 2022 another vote to refund the Rari hacked was brought forward this time it was not passed.

Prompts to Answer:

Outside the flipping of the vote, how would you choose to handle this situation?
i.e should parties be reimbursed for an exploit or not? (Please choose one of the below options and then elaborate upon your reasoning)

  1. Full Reimbursement

I actually posted my opinions on this issue when voting:

My response to Rari Merge

Basically, I think when the merge finished, the duty of Rari’s fund security has been merged too. So it’s impossible to pass the buck.

Languages I speak and write: English, Chinese

Disclosure of Conflict(s) of Interest:
Diversity of opinions is critical to making progress and determining the future direction of the
Arbitrum ecosystem. We recognize and celebrate the fact that delegates will have diverse views and we both encourage and anticipate good-faith debates in the governance process. That being said, it’s critical that all featured delegates are operating with Arbitrum’s best interest in mind, so please affirm that you don’t have any conflicts of interest that would prevent you from using your best judgement to operate in the best interests of advancing the Arbitrum ecosystem.

This information was sourced from https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/31/141


ProposalVotes forVotes againstVoted?

206.39M

8.67M

No vote

193.12M

4.05K

No vote

193.92M

266.93K

No vote

247.89M

362.6K

No vote

263.67M

16K

No vote